Comparisons

Guardian360 vs Hadrian

A Dutch offensive-security platform combining attack-surface management, continuous red teaming and CTEM.

What Hadrian is good at

Hadrian is a hacker-led, Amsterdam-based platform for external attack-surface management, continuous automated red teaming and CTEM, with strong cloud and supply-chain discovery. It is offensive-testing led.

Side by side

How they compare

Guardian360Hadrian
Origin & data residencyNetherlands, EU-onlyNetherlands (EU); Amsterdam HQ
Delivery modelPartner-onlyDirect + select partners
DeploymentAgentlessAgentless EASM / autonomous attack simulation
Compliance coverage25+ frameworks, continuously mappedMaps to NIS2 / DORA exposure requirements
Intrusion detectionBuilt-in honeypotsContinuous automated red teaming (offensive)
Microsoft 365 insightIncludedExternal surface only
Container & cloud scanningPlanned for 2026Yes (cloud + DNS + supply-chain)
Smallest clientFrom 10 employees / IPsMid-market 100+

Based on publicly available information at the time of writing. Vendors evolve quickly — always verify the latest details with each provider.

When Hadrian may fit better

Mid-market and larger organisations that want continuous offensive testing and external attack-surface discovery.

When Guardian360 fits better

Organisations that want continuous defensive scanning, compliance mapping, honeypot detection and Microsoft 365 insight in one partner-delivered EU platform, from 10 employees up.

Common questions

Guardian360 vs Hadrian, answered

Both are Dutch — how do they differ?

Hadrian leads with offensive testing and attack-surface discovery; Guardian360 leads with continuous defensive scanning, detection and compliance mapping. Many organisations use both.

Is Guardian360 for smaller teams too?

Yes, from 10 employees, where Hadrian targets mid-market 100+.

See it on your own environment

Run a free Quickscan, start a trial, or talk to a partner. Guardian360 is delivered exclusively through our partners.