Guardian360 vs Lywand
An audit and risk-assessment platform for MSPs with automated reporting and up to 80% auto-healing, focused on DACH.
What Lywand is good at
Lywand gives MSPs automated vulnerability and risk reporting with CIS benchmark mapping and Auto Healing. It is DACH-focused, with hosting that can depend on the MSP.
Side by side
How they compare
| Guardian360 | Lywand | |
|---|---|---|
| Origin & data residency | Netherlands, EU-only (NL cloud) | Austria/Germany; hosting depends on MSP |
| Delivery model | Partner-only | Direct / partner / MSP (open ecosystem) |
| Deployment | Agentless, API-based | Agentless scanning |
| Compliance coverage | 25+ frameworks, continuously mapped | CIS benchmarks; evidence export |
| Intrusion detection | Built-in honeypots | N/A |
| Microsoft 365 insight | Included | Via connectors; not core |
| Auto-remediation | Partner-guided | Auto Healing (up to 80%) |
Based on publicly available information at the time of writing. Vendors evolve quickly — always verify the latest details with each provider.
When Lywand may fit better
MSPs in the DACH region that want automated audits with built-in auto-healing and flexible (including self-hosted) deployment.
When Guardian360 fits better
Partners that want continuous scanning, 25+ framework mapping, honeypot detection and Microsoft 365 insight with a committed NL data-hosting guarantee.
Common questions
Guardian360 vs Lywand, answered
Where is data hosted?
Guardian360 commits to NL data hosting. With Lywand, hosting can depend on the MSP and region.
Does Guardian360 auto-remediate?
Remediation is partner-guided by design, so your partner stays in control; Lywand offers automated Auto Healing.
See it on your own environment
Run a free Quickscan, start a trial, or talk to a partner. Guardian360 is delivered exclusively through our partners.